Recently I sat across from a manager at an aged care home and watched a good idea get in the way of a better one.
I was there to talk about cultural awareness training for her team. She told me, warmly and with real pride, that they already had it covered. Her provider runs homes right across the state, and they employ a nurse educator whose whole job is to bring their internationally trained nurses up to speed on the Australian way of working: clinical standards, documentation, the systems, the expectations. So, she said, they were sorted.
I left knowing I had not made my case. This article is the case I wish I had made.
Here is the heart of it. Orientating your overseas nurses and building cultural awareness across your team are two different things, and doing the first does not get you the second. Both matter. But the first is not the second.
Orientation points one way. It takes a newcomer and teaches them how we do things here. It is about the individual who has just arrived, and it quietly assumes the gap sits inside that one person. Cultural awareness is something else. It is the whole team learning to notice how culture shapes the way each of us communicates, reads silence, handles authority, and makes sense of the people around us. One is onboarding. The other is the everyday work of a diverse team caring well for vulnerable people.
Orientation points one way; culture runs in every direction
The quiet assumption underneath “we train our overseas nurses” is that culture is a deficiency the new arrival brings and orientation fixes. Make the new nurse more Australian, and the problem is solved.
But culture does not live inside one person. It lives in the space between people. At the home I visited, about half the care team had trained overseas, registered nurses and personal carers alike, working alongside colleagues who had trained here. So picture an ordinary shift. A nurse from the Philippines is handing over to a carer from South Sudan, who is about to shower a resident born in postwar Italy, while that resident’s daughter stands in the doorway worrying whether her mother is being understood. You can orient that nurse perfectly into “the Australian way” and you have still done nothing about the other cultures meeting around that one bed.
Awareness has to run in every direction or it is not awareness at all. The new nurse is reading her colleagues and her residents through her own cultural lens, and they are reading her through theirs. Australian-born staff misread culturally shaped behaviour just as easily as anyone else: they read quietness as a lack of confidence, indirectness as uncertainty, a reluctance to question a senior as poor judgement. None of that is touched by teaching one person the local rules. It is touched by helping everyone see how culture shapes communication in themselves.
This is not a fringe concern
The numbers make the scale plain. Just over half of all residential aged care employees were born overseas, and around two in five speak a language other than English at home.1 In many homes that is not the exception. It is the whole floor.
So the cultural interface in aged care is not occasional. It is the water everyone is swimming in, every shift, on both sides of the bed. Treating it as something that applies only to the latest overseas recruit misjudges where the real work is.
The people doing the most intimate care are not in the room
Notice who the nurse educator trains. Nurses. In the home I visited, half the hands-on staff were personal carers, and they were the ones doing the most intimate work there is: showering, toileting, dressing, feeding, the slow and patient business of helping someone at their most exposed.
That is where dignity is won or lost. It is the highest-stakes, most frequent cultural contact in the building, happening between a carer from one culture and a resident from another, often a resident with dementia who has lost the filter that smooths over an awkward moment. Yet the carers are the very people a nurse-focused orientation never reaches. If you are going to invest in anyone understanding culture and communication, the case is strongest for the people whose hands are on the residents all day. Good onboarding for international staff matters, but it cannot be the whole plan when half the floor is never in the room.
One educator cannot carry a whole culture
Even a gifted nurse educator, stretched across many homes, can only ever deliver an induction. A welcome, a download at the start, a “here is how we do things.” That is worth having. It is not the same as an ongoing habit of cultural awareness running through a team.
Cultural awareness is not a session you sit once and tick off. It is closer to a skill than a fact, and like any skill it has to be practised and refreshed over time, because the team keeps changing and the assumptions keep hiding. One person carrying that for dozens of homes is not a strategy. It is a job description doing the work that a whole culture should be doing.
The cost a manager actually feels
If the dignity argument does not move a budget, this one should. Friction between staff is expensive.
In my own years working across many cultures, the thing that drove good people out was almost never the work itself. It was the daily grind of being misread by the people beside them, of never quite knowing why an interaction went wrong. A diverse team with no shared cultural literacy produces exactly that: misunderstanding, withdrawal, complaints, and the slow turnover of staff you spent a fortune recruiting. A manager feels it as roster gaps and incident reports long before anyone names it as a cultural problem.
Cultural awareness is not a nicety bolted onto the side of the real work. It is retention and it is risk.
The person we keep forgetting is the resident
Here is the part that should stop us. Cultural safety is not measured by how well the staff were oriented. It is measured by whether the person receiving the care felt respected, understood, and safe enough to speak up. The resident is the judge, not the provider.
So the real question is not “are our overseas nurses trained for Australia?” It is “does the elderly Australian in bed four, and the anxious daughter beside her, feel genuinely understood by the team caring for them?” Orientation never asks that question. It is pointed entirely at the staff. The resident, the one person cultural safety actually belongs to, is left out of the frame.
What this means if you manage a team
If half your team trained overseas, you have not finished the job by orienting them. You have done the first, necessary thing. The second thing, helping the whole team read each other and read their residents across culture, is the one that protects your people, your residents, and your name on the door.
That is the case I wish I had made in that meeting. Orientation trains the overseas nurse. It does not train the team.
At Culture Creek Australia we work with the whole team, not only the international staff, to build the cross-cultural communication and confidence that diverse aged care teams run on. If that is the gap in your aged care home, book a free consultation, or take a look at our Communication for Safety course.
References
